OSW Sustainability Benchmark
Customer & supply-chain assessment · 2025
DashboardMethodologyCompany ProfilesCompareEvidence Explorer
DashboardMethodologyCompany ProfilesCompareEvidence Explorer

Company profiles

Detailed sustainability profile, pillar breakdown, strongest and weakest metrics, and full 15-metric evidence per company.

#1 · OSW developer / operator
Ørsted
Leader
96.2/ 100
Future28.6/30
Env.42.6/45
Gov.25.0/25
#2 · Integrated utility
EDF
Leader
91.6/ 100
Future26.4/30
Env.41.8/45
Gov.23.4/25
#3 · Integrated utility
Iberdrola
Leader
89.8/ 100
Future27.8/30
Env.38.6/45
Gov.23.4/25
#4 · Integrated utility
Vattenfall
Leader
86.6/ 100
Future27.0/30
Env.37.2/45
Gov.22.4/25
#5 · Integrated utility
RWE
Leader
86.6/ 100
Future28.4/30
Env.35.8/45
Gov.22.4/25
#6 · Integrated utility
SSE
Strong
84.2/ 100
Future25.4/30
Env.36.4/45
Gov.22.4/25
#7 · Integrated utility
EnBW
Strong
75.2/ 100
Future24.6/30
Env.30.6/45
Gov.20.0/25
#8 · O&G transitioning to OSW
Equinor
Strong
72.6/ 100
Future22.8/30
Env.29.8/45
Gov.20.0/25
#9 · OSW joint venture
JERA Nex bp
Moderate
65.2/ 100
Future23.4/30
Env.26.8/45
Gov.15.0/25
#10 · Infrastructure / asset manager
COP / CIP
Moderate
61.6/ 100
Future17.6/30
Env.29.0/45
Gov.15.0/25
#11 · Renewable energy developer
Masdar
Moderate
59.0/ 100
Future18.2/30
Env.25.8/45
Gov.15.0/25
#12 · OSW developer / operator
Ocean Winds
Limited
49.2/ 100
Future11.0/30
Env.25.2/45
Gov.13.0/25

OSW Sustainability Benchmark · Methodology and scores derived from publicly disclosed sustainability reports for the 2025 reporting cycle.

Three-pillar architecture: Future Commitments (30%) · Environmental Action (45%) · Governance & Accountability (25%). 100-point core score; no separate external-validation add-on.